Print

E-Mail Story

Comment

News Letter Sign up


Reboots showcase evolving special effects


July 26, 2016

1 Image
    The expression “what’s old is new again” applies these days when it comes to Hollywood’s big-budget tentpole movies. The release of Ghostbusters is just one more example of the Hollywood remake/reboot/sequel machine working overtime to revisit anything and everything old enough to possibly be considered a classic.
    Later this year, audiences can also look forward to a reimagining of Pete’s Dragon, a modern Magnificent Seven and an action-blockbuster take on Ben-Hur, all of which look to past decades in the hopes of making beloved films fresh — not to mention profitable — again.
    Equally appropriate for movies such as these, though, is another common expression: “They sure don’t make ’em like they used to” — quite literally, in fact.
    Here’s a look back at a few examples of remakes, reboots and sequels of older classics from just this year and how special effects have changed from the original to the modern versions:

    Ghostbusters (1984/2016):The original Ghostbusters was arguably the first of its kind: less a comedy with special effects and more an “effects movie” with comedy. Remarkably, the whole thing was completed in just 
10 short months with a special effects budget of only $5 million, according to effects supervisor Richard Edlund (via tested.com). In order to bring the movie’s variety of ghouls, poltergeists and Sumerian gods to life, the effects team used an equally varied bunch of “old-school” techniques ranging from foam latex puppets (such as Slimer) to miniatures to matte paintings and anything else they could think of. The vast majority of it, however, was done in-camera, meaning that it didn’t require postproduction tweaking.
    While the tools have changed drastically, the new Ghostbusters carries part of that tradition into the modern age, according to a lot of early reviews, as a splashy effects-driven action-comedy that, unlike most 3-D movies, might be worth ponying up the extra cash to see with the funny glasses.

    Independence Day (1996)/Independence Day: Resurgence (2016):
Anyone old enough to remember seeing director Roland Emmerich’s first foray into multimillion-dollar cinematic destruction will no doubt remember the movie’s signature special effects shot: the White House getting blown up by a giant blue alien death beam.
    Independence Day earned its effects team, led by Volker Engel, an Oscar for Best Visual Effects. In his acceptance speech, Engel said, “This is movie magic,” according to The Hollywood Reporter.
    It may be hard to believe given today’s CGI wonderlands, but according to Engel (via The Hollywood Reporter), 95 percent of the effects for the original Independence Day were done using miniatures with motion-control cameras. That includes the White House shot, which Engel said was staged using a 15-foot-wide-by-5-foot-high model complete with individually detailed floors and custom miniature furniture.
    This summer’s Independence Day: Resurgence shows just how much visual effects have changed in the past two decades. Compared to the original film’s 430 visual effects shots, the new movie boasts a staggering 1,750, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Engel, who once again oversaw the film’s special effects, said they still used things such as props and models, but now they’re all done digitally inside a computer.

Superman (1978)/Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016): “You’ll believe a man can fly,” as the movie’s tagline famously said, and while the techniques used to make Christopher Reeve soar through the sky like a bird (no, a plane … no, Superman!) might seem primitive by today’s standards, they were downright revolutionary circa 1978.
    According to fxphd.com, the film pioneered, among other things, a brand-new technology known as the Zoptic front-projection system to capture the effect of Superman flying toward the screen.
    A special “cape-fluttering” device was also developed that used remote-controlled poles like one might find in an umbrella.
    Superman was also the first movie to feature a computer-generated title sequence, in the sense that the “streak” photography used for the titles involved a camera controlled by computer (but not CGI), according to filmsite.org.
    By contrast, in the character’s latest cinematic outing, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, it’s apparent just how much the use of green screens has developed — everything from the backgrounds to the pounding rain to Superman’s cape and even Batman’s armor, in many instances, are CGI, according to batman-news.com. (No need for mechanical cape-flutterers here!) This allows for filmmaking to be more visually dynamic than 1978’s Superman director, Richard Donner, likely ever could have dreamed.

Print

E-Mail Story

News Letter Sign up

Bookmark and Share
« Previous Story | Next Story »
 

COMMENTS

http://www.connectstatesboro.com/ encourages readers to interact with one another. We will not edit your comments, but we reserve the right to delete any inappropriate responses. To report offensive or inappropriate comments, contact our editor. The comments below are from readers of http://www.connectstatesboro.com/ and do not necessarily represent the views of Publication or Morris Multimedia.

You must be logged in to post comments.  [LOGIN]



You must be logged in to post comments.  [LOGIN]